I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
ВсеГосэкономикаБизнесРынкиКапиталСоциальная сфераАвтоНедвижимостьГородская средаКлимат и экологияДеловой климат
。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
丰田1月销量同比增长4.8%，创历年1月销量新高
如果担心 ReLU 死神经元，可尝试 Leaky ReLU 或 ELU